Friday, June 5, 2015

About LSZH Cable

Halogen-Free Cable
Increasingly used in public and government buildings and where there is sensitive electronic equipment (i.e. Hospitals, Supermarkets, Airports, Control Rooms & Computer Suites) these cables are designed for increased safety in the case of a fire:
  •         Reduction in hazardous fumes which can cause injury when inhaled
  •        Reduction in corrosive chemicals which can cause damage to electronics

Historically, most cables used in installations have been insulated with PVC or similar materials.  In fires, these insulation materials release chlorine gas.  Chlorine is a poisonous gas and a danger to people.  In addition it forms hydrochloric acid when coming into contact with water.   Hydrochloric acid (HCL) can have devastating effects on adjacent equipment.
To overcome the problems associated with the release of chlorine gas, halogen-free cables are used.  Typically a halogen free cable is made of polypropylene, which does not produce a dangerous gas or acid in fire conditions.
What are halogens?
Halogens are non-metallic elements found in the periodic table. The five halogens are fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, & astatine. A common material that contains halogens in the chemical structure is PVC. Halogens make cable jackets and insulation highly flame retardant. Some naturally non-halogenated materials have halogen added because of the flame retardant properties. When burned, halogens emit a thick toxic smoke and become corrosive. These characteristics can cause damage to equipment and pose a safety concern.
Why consider halogen-free cable?
Over the last few years, halogen-free wire and cabling products have seen an increase in popularity. Halogen-free cables are used in consideration of issues including fire safety, fire damage prevention, and the environment. Halogen-free cables help eliminate the use of environmentally sensitive materials.
What does LSZH mean?
LSZH stands for low smoke zero halogen. The compounds in the cable insulation and jacket have no fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, or astatine. This means that the cable emits little to no toxic halogens and minimal smoke when in contact with fire. These are important safety precautions and they often appear together in wire and cable specifications. LSZH wire and cable is also called: low smoke non halogen (LSNH), low smoke halogen free (LSHF), and low smoke zero (0) halogen (LS0H).
In what applications can halogen-free cable be used?
Halogen-free cable is intended for use in applications in which insulation with low toxicity, low smoke generation, and low corrosiveness is needed. Examples include rapid transit, industrial, shipboard, and commercial fields where human safety and protection of equipment is a concern.
Does the NEC allow low-smoke halogen-free cable in all applications?
The NEC (National Electrical Code) doesn't prohibit halogen-free cable or wire installation in any application. The NEC does require low smoke cables for plenum spaces.
Is there a difference between low smoke and zero halogen?
Low smoke and zero halogen are not equivalent. Low smoke cable emits a thinner and clearer smoke when burning. This feature makes evacuation and firefighting efforts much easier and safer. A cable may be low smoke and still contain toxic halogens. Zero halogen means that the cable does not contain fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine or astatine. Zero halogen cable may still emit a thick smoke when burned. Both properties are not always needed for all cables. Check specifications to be sure that the cable meets both requirements if necessary for your application.
Are there any disadvantages to using low smoke zero halogen cables?
Low smoke zero halogen cables provide a lot of great safety advantages, but there is a bit of an electrical and mechanical trade-off. In order to be low smoke zero halogen, the cable jacket must incorporate a high percentage of filler material. This increase in filler material could make the jacket less chemical and water resistant and could provide poorer mechanical and electrical properties than a non-LSZH counterpart. LSZH jackets are also more likely to experience jacket cracking during installation, so special lubricants may be necessary to avoid damage. This is especially true in cold environments. Because of the limited flexibility of LSZH, it is not recommended in robotic or continuous flex applications. As a result, LSZH cable is commonly chosen for applications where fire safety is more of a concern than the cable’s specific electrical and mechanical properties. Advances in compound materials and processing have decreased some of these issues.
Can LSZH pass a flame test?
Yes. LSZH may pass a standard flame test. To determine how an LSZH cable will react in a fire, the following five criteria are considered:
·        How easily the cable will catch fire
·        How quickly the fire will spread along the cable
·        How much smoke is produced upon combustion
·        How toxic are the byproducts
·        How corrosive are the byproducts
Some test standards related to this type of cable are Plenum rated, LS rated, S1 rated, and ASTM D5424.
What should be considered when choosing LSZH?
When choosing LSZH products, factors such as the environment and price should be considered. An environmental factor such as the temperature of the installation could reduce the flexibility of the cable. Will the application be in an open area or confined? Will other flammable material be present? Low smoke zero halogen cable also tends to be higher in cost. Consult an expert from Allied Wire and Cable to find the best fit for your application.


Cables intended to fulfil this type of function are often labelled as one of the following:
LSZH - Low Smoke Zero Halogen
LSOH - Low Smoke Zero Halogen
LSF - Low Smoke and Fume
OHLS - Zero Halogen Low Smoke
Both LSZH and LSF are used to limit smoke, fumes and halogen given off in fire conditions.
Halogen & Smoke Emission, Corrosively & Toxicity Standards
IEC 60754-1 / BS6425-1 - emission of halogen
IEC 60754-2 - corrosivity
IEC 61034-1 / ASTM E662 - emission of smoke
ISO4589-2 / BS2863 - oxygen index LOI
ISO4589-3 / BS2782.1 - temperature index TI

Saturday, May 30, 2015

Fire Extinguishers Key Points

Fire Extinguishers Manufacturers Bring Key Points To Remember For Businesses


Fire extinguishing equipment’s range is vast and every product is intended with single objective- to combat fire when needed. Manufacturers of fire extinguishers today explain key points that one should consider while installing or even planning for installing firefighting equipment’s to their premises and building. These are significant facts that one should remember every time while shopping or installing any fire extinguishing equipment into home or office premises. 
1.  Manufacturers producing distinct types of fire extinguishers 
Every fire extinguisher is intended with single objective, i.e. to fight against fire. Manufacturers are designing each type of extinguisher for different fires. It is crucial to ensure fire extinguisher types that you are going to use in your building. These products should be of right type and have potential to combat fire. 

2.  PASS is what you need to remember to use extinguisher 
PASS (Pull the pin, Aim low, Squeeze the lever, Sweep the nozzle) play vital role while using any extinguisher. Never forget this golden acronym as it will help you and guide you when you use fire extinguishing equipment. 

3.  Professional inspection 
Make sure you invite professionals from licensed fire protection company for authentic inspection. If you just make a call to any local center, you may be taking risk to your life and assets. So, never take the testing and inspection of fire fighting tools and equipments for granted. Contact experts who know how to inspect these equipments in best possible way to ensure safety of the public. 

4.  You must install them near exits 
By installing fire extinguishers near exits, you will get more safety while using it. In case of fire, when you use fire extinguisher hanging on the wall near to exit, you have a clear path to take stairs and get out of the building. Evacuating is the initial thing people do in case of fire mishap. 

5.  Train people so that they can easily use fire extinguishers
It is necessary to provide special training to people in order to make them eligible to use fire extinguishers. There are many fire extinguisher manufacturers offering free training sessions to their clients. People can purchase extinguishers from them and get trained from professionals. 

These are essential points to remember at any cost. When you forget any of these points, you may encounter some serious trouble- believe us, we don’t wish this for you!

Saturday, April 4, 2015

Fire Detection for Large Spaces

Fire Detection for Large Spaces: Integrating Aspiration Smoke Detection

Modern structures are complex, which makes them difficult to protect against smoke and fire. Features like large atria, vast open areas, or high ceilings can make the use of traditional smoke and fire detection methods impractical, ineffective, and difficult to maintain and operate.
Large, open spaces are prone to high airflow and smoke stratification (caused by the high ceilings and/or dilution of the smoke), making it difficult for smoke to reach spot-type smoke detectors and for conventional detection devices to operate properly. Additionally, significant effort is required just to test and inspect these devices in such spaces, per code requirements.
In general, fire detection in large volume spaces directly relates to the size of potential fires within the space. Building contents such as furniture, large trash containers, or merchandise displays typically burn with enough energy to push smoke to significant heights. However, low energy fires with a small heat-release rate are subject to stratification and can be difficult for ceiling or near-ceiling mounted smoke detection devices to detect.
What is considered a large space?
Large spaces are those with ceiling or roof heights extending tens or even hundreds of feet above the floor. Some examples are:
·        Spaces containing atria, such as hotel lobbies and shopping centers
·        Warehouses and distribution centers
·        Record/archive storage facilities and automated storage and retrieval warehouses
·        Manufacturing plants, such as automobile assembly plants
·        Convention centers, theatres, auditoriums, stadiums, and indoor sports facilities
·        Cathedrals, churches, temples, and mosques
·        Aircraft hangars and other large storage and maintenance areas
·        Transportation terminals, such as airport terminals and train stations

Regarding fire protection, large spaces can be classified into two basic categories:
Category 1: Large volume spaces with fire-load contents, generally of limited height, located on the main floor or other floors open to the large volume. These spaces tend to have moderate to large occupant loads. Examples: atria areas, single-story manufacturing areas, heritage buildings, religious worship buildings, and airport terminals.

Category 2: Large volume spaces with stacks or piles of combustible contents, which may or may not be in storage racks. These contents occupy a significant portion of the volume and height of the space that is most often one story. These spaces tend to have low to moderate occupant loads and a high value of contents. Examples: warehouses, distribution centers, automated storage and retrieval facilities, and library stack rooms.
Detecting Smoke in Category 1: Hotel
Atria, a popular architectural design feature, enhance the perception of light and space within structures but can be dangerous for occupants in a fire. One fire design challenge is compensating for the fluctuation of solar radiation that enters through large expanses of glass, which can often generate thermal gradients within the space and result in a hot gas layer near the ceiling or roof. This can vary from day-to-day, depending on thermal load and operations of HVAC or natural ventilation systems.
The base of the atrium is especially vulnerable. A fire at this location could potentially fill the unenclosed shaft with smoke, allowing fire to spread rapidly and transport heat, smoke, and toxic gases from floor to floor. More importantly, traditional technologies take too long to detect smoke in these large areas because smoke may not be buoyant enough to penetrate the ceiling layer of stratified environments. Aspirating smoke detection systems, however, can be designed to avoid the issues posed for ceiling-mounted spot smoke detectors due to a solar-induced hot layer.
Detecting Smoke in Category 2: Warehouses
Category 2 spaces require additional considerations beyond those previously discussed. Modern warehouses and storage facilities often rely on automatic sprinkler systems for basic fire protection. However, the potential loss of key supply chain facilities, high value storage, and irreplaceable archived storage can warrant the installation of early warning smoke detection for staff intervention before sprinklers are needed.
Arson and electrical/mechanical systems account for a significant percentage of warehouse fires, but aspirating smoke detection can provide early indications of such events and allow for manual fire suppression or depowering of equipment. STRUCTURE FIRES IN U.S. WAREHOUSES by Richard Campbell, published in June 2013 by the National Fire Protection Association Fire Analysis and Research Division, says that during 2007-2011, an estimated average of 1,270 structure fires in warehouses were reported to U.S. fire departments each year, with associated annual losses of 4 civilian deaths, 23 civilian injuries, and $188 million in direct property damage. According to Campbell:
·        Nearly one-fifth of these fires were set intentionally
·        Electrical distribution or lighting equipment was involved in 13% of fires
·        Electrical failure or malfunction was the leading factor contributing to the ignition of warehouse fires, as well as in contributing to direct property damage and to civilian injuries, representing 19% of the total in each category
Integrating Aspiration Smoke Detection
There are five basic design options for integrating an aspirating smoke detection system in warehouse and storage buildings. Selecting a sampling pipe configuration is dependent upon the warehouse application and internal characteristics (such as presence of high-bay racking, mezzanines, and voids) as well as the facility’s operational objectives and smoke detection objectives (performance-related).
1.     Near Ceiling Detection – sampling pipes are located close to the ceiling only
2.     Below Ceiling Detection – sampling pipes above a ceiling use drop down pipes or capillary tubes with sampling holes
3.     High-Low Alternating Detection – sampling pipes are located on the ceiling with alternating sampling holes on the ceiling and drop-down pipes
4.     Multi-Level Detection – this detection method applies to warehouses comprising high bay storage racks and utilizes more than one ASD system for ceiling and intermediate level detection.
5.     In-Rack Detection – the sampling pipes run horizontally or vertically between back-to-back racks at various heights. Drop-down pipes from the ceiling can also be used for in-rack detection.

In addition to these generic warehouse scenarios, additional aspiration protection should be considered in the following situations:
·        Office and control area: for aesthetic reasons, sampling in these areas is usually conducted via capillary tubes fed through the ceiling from the main sampling pipes, which are located in the ceiling void.
·        Ceiling void: it is especially important to protect ceiling voids containing cabling and/or any other equipment, due to an increased risk of fire. The spacing of the ASD sampling holes is again determined using the grid method.
·        Lighting areas: The ASD sampling pipes should not be placed underneath or in close proximity (<3.3 ft (1 m)) to lighting fixtures, heaters, skylights, or other heat-emitting objects.
·        Loading bay: ASD sensitivity should be lowered to account for the truck exhaust fumes regularly present in the loading bay environment.
Installation Scenarios
NFPA 72 provisions on the spacing and location of smoke detectors states that, “The location and spacing of smoke detectors shall be based upon the anticipated smoke flows due to the plume and ceiling jet produced by the anticipated fire, as well as any pre-existing ambient airflows that could exist in the protected compartment.”
Aspirating systems can be mounted wherever it is most convenient – on walls, columns or rack frames – but it’s recommended to mount the units in close proximity. For example, these units can be located in the center of a warehouse with the pipe network extending outward, toward the walls. This configuration minimizes the distance between detectors and reduces wiring costs.
There are many options for warehouse detection, including:
High-low alternating detection: this option is comprised of ceiling sampling holes that alternate with drop down pipes. This method is used to penetrate the hot air layer that may develop at the roof level, which allows for optimal sampling when the air at the roof level is either hot or cold. Consult local codes and standards to determine the correct length of drop down pipes for individual facility configurations [Figure 17].
In-rack detection: This may be used in warehouses with high-bay racking where stratification occurs, and/or localized detection is required. The air sampling pipe can have either a horizontal or vertical in-rack detection configuration [Figure 18]. Ideally, the detector is installed at the end of the rack at an accessible level. As a safeguard against mechanical damage from forklift trucks, sampling pipes should be located between back-to-back racks out of harm’s way.
Non-high-bay racking detection: In this case, ceiling drop-down pipes may also be used for in-rack detection. When installing drop-down pipes, here too, it is important to ensure that they will not be damaged by forklifts or be in close proximity to the stored goods. The drop-down pipes can be fitted to the sheltered side of the racking, fixed to the rack frame [Figure 19]. In-rack drop-down pipes normally have two or three sampling holes drilled in them to provide sampling at different heights within the racking system.
Multi-level detection: Additionally, this option can be used in high bay storage racking areas with expected high stratification levels and/or mezzanines (catwalks) consisting of solid flooring that will impede/delay the rise of the smoke plume. This design option requires one ceiling aspirating system and multiple intermediate level aspirating systems [Figure 21].
Benefits of Aspirating Smoke Detection
There are many hidden benefits of integrating an aspirating smoke detection system into the fire detection system design for a large volume space. It’s often a challenge to handle diverse placement options in fire and life safety designs, but aspirating smoke detection technology is flexible. It can accommodate a variety of horizontal and vertical sampling point locations and/or capillary tubes – providing effective coverage while minimizing architectural and aesthetic impact. Aspiration smoke detection systems also allow for more specific levels of warnings and alarms to allow building staff to investigate before emergency operations (such as evacuation) are implemented.
Aspirating smoke detection systems can also provide maintenance flexibility and cost savings for large spaces. Inspection and testing is easy, because an air sampling pipe network can be in the upper elevations of large volume spaces while the air sampling detector is installed in a remote accessible location. By comparison, spot-type smoke detectors located on high ceilings would require special procedures for inspection. Furthermore, aspirating technology performance is more consistent and reliable because it is not subject to building movement considerations of optical beam smoke detection devices.
Smoke detection Aspirating systems generally include a sensor of considerably increased level of sensitivity compared with a standard point or line optical beam detectors. Such “high sensitivity” aspirating smoke detection systems, are designated Class A systems in BS EN 54-20 and are often used to protect critical electronic equipment rooms, in which even a very small fire can result in unacceptable damage. Guidance on fire protection of such facilities is given in BS 6266.
Typically, a Class B (enhanced sensitivity) or Class C (normal sensitivity) aspirating smoke detection system is used in such applications, but it is important to seek advice from suppliers with sufficient experience and knowledge of aspirating smoke detection systems and BS EN 54-20.
For aspirating systems, specialist application guidance needs to be sought from the manufacturer.

Saturday, March 7, 2015

Guidance for Coincidence Connection of Detectors for Extinguishing Systems

Guidance for Coincidence Connection of Detectors for Triggering Extinguishing Systems


This guide is a collation and explanation of the existing recommendations provided on the use of coincidence connected detectors with a particular focus on their application for triggering extinguishing systems. It defines a scheme for describing the different approaches to coincidence connection and in particular considers potential replacements for ionisation detectors.

Although predominantly aimed at assisting those involved in the automatic release of extinguishing systems, this FIA guide also provides information in situations where coincidence of detectors is needed for the actuation of other fire protection measures.

Review of Standards

There is a common misconception that BS 7273-1 Clause 5.2.3 calls for coincidence detection using two different types of detector, typically ionization and optical smoke detectors to trigger fire suppression systems. This is not correct.

5.2.3 Type of detector used

The selection of detectors should be in accordance with the recommendations given in BS 5839-1 and, where applicable, BS 6266. In some circumstances, fire detection considerations might dictate the need for use of two different principles of detection (e.g. optical smoke detectors and ionization chamber smoke detectors) to ensure the earliest warning of fire. In such circumstances, an even distribution of each type of detector should be provided throughout the protected space.

Where coincidence is used, normally it should be possible to achieve coincidence from two detectors of the same operating principle. In these cases, if, for example, two independent circuits are used to achieve coincidence, there should normally be an approximately equal number of detectors of each principle connected to each of the independent circuits. For example, where four detectors are required to protect the space and these comprise two optical smoke detectors and two ionization chamber smoke detectors; there should be one optical smoke detector and one ionization chamber smoke detector on each circuit.

However, it is not always necessary to use two different principles of fire detection. For example, given the type of fire anticipated and the speed of detection required, it might be acceptable to use detectors of a single type.

BS 7273-1 does not require the use of detectors using two different principles of operation:

·        Clause 5.2.2.1 suggests that co-incidence detection is one method of minimising the possibility of false discharge.

·        Clause 5.2.2.4 clarifies that co-incidence detection requires alarm signals from two independent detectors (whether the same type or not).

The second paragraph of clause 5.2.3 (above) was originally a continuation of paragraph 1 and as a separate paragraph is now confusing. The intent is to clarify that where mixed types are used, it is not normal to require both types (e.g. optical and ionisation) to have indicated an alarm before the extinguishant is released. In other words extinguishant may be triggered from any two independent detectors e.g. two ionisation detectors or two optical detectors or an ionisation and an optical detector.

Clause 5.2.3 only includes as examples the traditional combinations of optical and ionisation detectors. There are many other technologies which may be used, for example flame detection, multi-sensor devices, aspirating smoke detectors (ASD) which can be used to mitigate the risk of inadvertent discharge of extinguishant.

BS 7273-1 refers back to BS 5839-1 and BS 6266 for advice on the selection of fire detectors. Both these standards have been revised since BS 7273-1 was published and provide useful guidance:

·        BS 6266:2011 Clause 8.3
·        BS 5839-1:2013 Clause 21

Options for Coincidence Detection

Co-incidence detection is when at least two independent detectors are used to initiate the release of the extinguishing system. These can be of the same type or of two different types.

The type(s) chosen should be selected dependant on the fire risk and on the objectives of the fire system.

Given that ionisation smoke detection is in obsolescence, the traditional ionisation / optical combinations as exemplified in BS 7273-1 is losing relevance.

Some common possible alternative combinations include:

·        Optical & Optical
Traditional scatter type optical smoke detectors

o Optical smoke detectors must pass a range of fire tests including smouldering and flam-ing types and have proved to be suitable for many applications requiring co-incidence

o Flaming fires will be detected; however response may be slower than ionisation detec-tors


·        Optical & Optical-Heat (or Optical-Heat & Optical-Heat)

o Optical-Heat detectors speed the response of a standard optical smoke detector to a flaming fire by responding to heat

o Some Optical-Heat detectors may respond more slowly to a smouldering fire than a traditional optical detector

·        ASD & ASD (or ASD & other)
Very early warning of incipient fires is possible using Class A & B ASD systems which          can prompt early intervention and avoid automatic discharge of the fire suppression system
– whether to a real fire threat or an unwanted event (false alarm)
o    ASD & ASD requires two separate detectors to achieve true co-incidence detection
o    Inputs to the extinguishing system must be carefully selected (e.g. Class C only)
o    See also FIA Aspirating Smoke Detectors CoP

·        Optical & Flame (or Flame & Flame)
o    Fast detection of flaming fires
o     Flame detector requires unobstructed line of sight to area of coverage
o    Used only in special applications where flame is a particular risk

·        Multi-sensor & Multi-sensor (including dual-optical)

o   Many different types available with many different modes of operation therefore careful consideration needs to be made of the configuration of the detectors
o   Often designed to mitigate nuisance alarm risk and enhance fire detection

·        Heat & other

o   The use of heat detectors only is not recommended as heat detector response is very slow in comparison to a smoke detector

References and Applicable Standards

BS 5839-1:2013, Fire detection and fire alarm systems for buildings - Code of practice for design, installation, commissioning and maintenance of systems in non-domestic premises

BS 6266:2011, Fire protection for electronic equipment installations. Code of practice


BS 7273-1:2006, Code of practice for the operation of fire protection measures. Electrical actuation of gaseous total flooding extinguishing systems.