Thursday, January 1, 2026

Competence vs Certification

 Competence vs. Certification for a Person

๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—œ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜€

In today’s world, everyone is chasing visibility, titles, and recognition.
But here’s the truth: competing with others is outdated. The real differentiator now is collaboration, creativity, and contribution.

A wide range of certification programs are now available for different sectors from various industries. Given that one industry is unique from another, there are several procedures followed by industry-specific needs, creating an unstandardized process.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Competence refers to a person’s ability to apply knowledge, skills, and behaviors to perform a task successfully in a real-world context. It’s more than just what someone knows - it's about how well they can use that knowledge effectively. They might be no academic certificate.

A competence often includes three dimensions:

Knowledge (theoretical understanding)

Skills (practical abilities)

Attitudes and behaviors (how a person acts in a given real-world context)

Example: A competent project manager doesn’t just know about project planning—they can lead a team, communicate clearly with stakeholders, manage risk, and adapt to challenges.

๐Ÿค— KPI

·        Focus: The actual real life or site specific application of knowledge and skills to perform tasks effectively. 

·        Nature: A current state of capability, assessed through performance. 

·        Examples: The ability to solve problems, make decisions, full fill the customer focus or adapt to new situations. 

·        Assessment: Involves practical examinations and observation to measure the ability to achieve desired results. Customer satisfaction system handover.

๐Ÿ‘‰ A qualification or certification is a formal recognition of learning or achievement which is granted by an educational institution, professional body, or certifying authority after a person completes a course, passes an exam, assessment or meets specific criteria.

A qualification or certification often includes two dimensions:

Knowledge (theoretical understanding)

Skills (theoretical & sometimes practical lab abilities)

Example: A degree in marketing, a Microsoft certification, or a teaching license are all qualifications. They prove that a person has completed a particular program or standard of learning.

๐Ÿค— KPI

·        Focus: Formal education, training, and documented experience.

·        Nature: A historical fact or status.

·        Examples: A driving license, a college degree, or certificates from training courses.

·        Assessment: Based on credentials and proof of training.

In short:

๐Ÿ”น Qualifications tell us what someone has learned.

๐Ÿ”น Competences show us what someone can actually do.

Lately, I’ve been noticing how students (and even professionals) run after certificates as if that’s the ultimate key to success.

A new course? “Certificate mil raha hai bhai, karna hi padega!”

Many skip the actual learning part, just to grab the certificate at the end. In current date AI is there to pass exam.

LinkedIn is full of such posts — some celebrating skills, but many just stacking certificates like badges.

According to ISO 19011, Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems, competence is defined as “the ability to apply knowledge and skills to achieve intended results.” In practical terms, competence-based certification requires candidates to demonstrate their abilities through validated means - such as examinations, practical assessments, or performance evaluations - covering not only knowledge, but also skills and behaviors aligned with the certification’s scope.

On the other hand, qualification-based certification typically relies on reviewing the applicant’s education, course attendance, or prior training. It assumes that completion of training equals capability, with minimal or no independent verification of actual performance or ability.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Consider the following simple yet illustrative exchange:

- "Do you know how to drive a car?"

- "I’ve taken lessons, and I have a license, but I’m still not confident behind the wheel."

- "Then you have the qualifications, but not the competence."

๐Ÿ‘‰ This brief dialogue captures a critical truth: Qualifications alone do not guarantee competence. History is filled with examples of individuals - college dropouts among them - who rose to executive leadership roles not because of their academic records, but because of their demonstrated competence.

๐Ÿ‘‰ No certificate or degree will fulfill your dreams unless you have the real skills to back it up.

Certificates may open a door, but only skills will help you stay inside the room.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Similarities Between Competence and Certification or Qualification

Despite the differences, these two concepts are interconnected:

·        Qualifications often serve as a foundation for building competences. For example, a person with a qualification in data analysis likely has some competences in handling data, interpreting results, or using analytical tools.

·        Both are used in recruitment, promotion, and development decisions.

·        In some fields (e.g., healthcare or engineering), certain qualifications are required to demonstrate competence in critical tasks.

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) developed ISO/IEC 17024:2012, Conformity assessment – General Requirements for Bodies Operating Certification of Persons which contains principles and requirements for a body certifying persons against specific requirements and includes the development and maintenance of a certification scheme for persons.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Personnel Certification is a certificate issued by an independent professional body that the proven qualifications and skills match predefined training goals. It tests and certifies qualifications and competences with a highly specialized team of examination designers and experts in this field. The entire process is developed together with the organization, with maximum reliability on professional experience and proximity to the clients. The service is highly applicable to the following:

·        Companies who place great importance on the excellent qualification of their staff in order to deliver excellent service, advice, and support can be informed which employees have met the required competency targets.

·        Associations who want to offer an additional high quality qualification that particularly recommends the member companies can be informed whether the participating staff of the member companies has reached the target competence.

·        Training providers with qualified experts who want to specialize further in order to be the best employee or freelance contractor in their field can have confidence in their own training and have their examination carried out by an independent third party.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Key Differences in Personnel Certification

·        What They Prove:

Qualification proves that a person has received training or possesses certain credentials, whereas competence proves that a person can do something effectively. 

·        Assessment Methods:

Qualifications are often verified by reviewing documents (e.g., diplomas, certificates), while competence requires performance-based evaluations or practical tests to assess how well someone applies their knowledge and skills. 

·        Relationship:

While having qualifications can contribute to competence, they don't guarantee it. A person might be highly qualified but lack the practical competence to perform a job successfully, or they may be highly competent without extensive formal qualifications.

๐Ÿ‘‰ OSHA’s “Competent Person” vs. “Qualified Person”: Why the Distinction Matters in Safety & the Future of Work
In safety management, words aren’t just semantics—they shape responsibility.

๐Ÿ”น A Qualified Person (29 CFR 1926.32(m)) means one who, by possession of a recognized degree, certificate, or professional standing, or who by extensive knowledge, training, and experience, has successfully demonstrated his ability to solve or resolve problems relating to the subject matter, the work, or the project.

๐Ÿ”น A Competent Person (29 CFR 1926.32(f)) is empowered to identify hazards and take immediate corrective action. Think of them as the boots-on-the-ground authority, ensuring risks are recognized and eliminated in real time.

This dual requirement shows how safety is both practical and technical—authority on site, backed by expertise in design.

Now imagine the future: AI-driven hazard recognition systems that instantly flag risks, combined with human competent persons authorized to act. Or AI-assisted designs ensuring qualified persons make even more precise decisions.

The question is not whether AI will redefine “competence” and “qualification,” but how we, as safety leaders, will integrate these emerging tools without losing human judgment.

Because at the end of the day, safety isn’t just compliance—it’s foresight.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Why the Distinction Matters

·        Workplace Safety:

A "qualified" person might design a system, but a "competent" person is needed to recognize hazards and ensure safety in the actual work environment. 

·        Effective Training:

Competency-based programs focus on the results of training by assessing actual abilities, leading to more targeted development and better-skilled employees. 

·        Better Hiring Decisions:

Distinguishing between competence and qualification helps employers make more accurate hiring and promotion decisions by assessing a candidate's practical abilities, not just their educational background.

๐Ÿ‘‰ American National Standards Institute (ANSI) also has a definition for a competent person and another for a qualified person.

ANSI defines a competent person as “an individual designated by the employer to be responsible for the immediate supervision, implementation, and monitoring of the employer’s managed fall protection program who, through training and knowledge, is capable of identifying, evaluating, and addressing existing and potential fall hazards, and who has the employer’s authority to take prompt, corrective action with regards to such hazards.”

ANSI defines a qualified person as “a person with a recognized degree or professional certificate and with extensive knowledge, training, and experience in the fall protection and rescue field who is capable of designing, analyzing, evaluating, and specifying fall protection and rescue systems to the extent required by this standard.”

๐Ÿ‘‰ Empathy + Analytics = True Quality:

Data gives you numbers ๐Ÿ”ข
Empathy gives you context ๐Ÿงพ

The best QA leaders know how to blend both.
An agent’s low score might not mean incompetence, it could mean lack of clarity, wrong training, or unrealistic expectations.
When analytics meets empathy, real quality improvement happens ๐Ÿ†

⚜️ Competence vs. Professionalism ⚜️
๐Ÿค— Unfortunately, we will not be moving forward with your candidacy for the position of...

Yes, the job market is tough right now. But is it really that bad?

In roughly 90% of cases, you’re simply not seen or heard.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Candidate A is competent:
๐Ÿ”น Motivated.
๐Ÿ”น Knows every interview stage.
๐Ÿ”น Has N years of experience, mastered M technologies across K domains.
๐Ÿ”น Their background looks complex - or at least they try to make it look that way.
๐Ÿ”บ The problem? Matching that exact mix with a company is rare, and usually companies want even more ๐Ÿค”

๐Ÿ“จ "...Your qualifications and experiences will be reviewed to determine if there’s a mutual fit..." - that’s the standard automated reply.

And the final response usually sounds the same:
๐Ÿ“จ "Unfortunately, we will not be moving forward with your candidacy for the position of…"
Sometimes they add: “Let’s stay in touch...” - but it doesn’t really change anything.

Do you know who actually gets ahead (if the position is truly open)?

๐Ÿ‘‰ Candidate B is a professional. Here’s what they do:
๐Ÿ”น They research the company.
๐Ÿ”น They dig for insights into the tech stack, pain points, and direction of development.
๐Ÿ”น Then they reach out and say: “I can help solve your problems in domains D1 and D2 using technologies T1 and T2 (and maybe T3 and T4). I already have experience doing this, for example, at..."

๐Ÿ’ก Businesses react instantly to this approach. Sometimes there won’t even be a full interview - or it gets simplified.

With the same (or similar) competence, Candidate B shows professionalism from the company’s perspective, and that’s why they get noticed.

Of course, it’s not foolproof, but it’s far more effective than Candidate A’s approach.

๐Ÿ‘‰ A nice fairy tale? Not at all. This is reality.

๐ŸŽฌ Even a 2009 movie said it best:
“Baccha, kamyaab hone ke liye nahi… kabil hone ke liye padho.
Success ke peeche mat bhaago, excellence ke peeche bhaago."

เคธिเคฐ्เคซ เคธเคซเคฒ (Successful) เคนोเคจे เค•े เคชीเค›े เคฎเคค เคญाเค—ो, เคฌเคฒ्เค•ि เคธเค•्เคทเคฎ (Capable) เคฌเคจो, เคคाเค•ि เคธเคซเคฒเคคा เค…เคชเคจे เค†เคช เคคुเคฎ्เคนाเคฐे เคชीเค›े เค†เค; เคถिเค•्เคทा เค•ा เคฎเค•เคธเคฆ เคœ्เคžाเคจ เค”เคฐ เค•ाเคฌिเคฒिเคฏเคค เคนाเคธिเคฒ เค•เคฐเคจा เคนोเคจा เคšाเคนिเค, เคจ เค•ि เคธिเคฐ्เคซ เคกिเค—्เคฐी เคฏा เคฎाเคฐ्เค•्เคธ เคชाเคจा, เค•्เคฏोंเค•ि เค•ाเคฌिเคฒिเคฏเคค เคนी เค…เคธเคฒी เคธเคซเคฒเคคा เค•ी เค•ुंเคœी เคนै เค”เคฐ เค‰เคค्เค•ृเคท्เคŸเคคा (Excellence) เค•ा เคชीเค›ा เค•เคฐเคจे เคธे เค•ाเคฎเคฏाเคฌी (Success) เคœ़เคฐूเคฐ เคฎिเคฒเคคी เคนै.

·        เค•ाเคฎเคฏाเคฌी (Success): เค…เค•्เคธเคฐ เคฒोเค— เคธिเคฐ्เคซ เคชैเคธा, เคชเคฆ เคฏा เค…เคš्เค›ी เคจौเค•เคฐी เคชाเคจे เค•े เคฒिเค เคชเคข़เคคे เคนैं, เคœिเคธे เค•ाเคฎเคฏाเคฌी เค•เคนเคคे เคนैं, เคฒेเค•िเคจ เคฏเคน เค…เคธ्เคฅाเคฏी เคนो เคธเค•เคคी เคนै.

·        เค•ाเคฌिเคฒिเคฏเคค (Capability): เค•ाเคฌिเคฒ เคนोเคจे เค•ा เคฎเคคเคฒเคฌ เคนै เค•ि เค†เคชเค•े เคชाเคธ เคœ्เคžाเคจ, เค•ौเคถเคฒ เค”เคฐ เคธเคฎเค เคนो, เคœिเคธเคธे เค†เคช เค•िเคธी เคญी เคฎुเคถ्เค•िเคฒ เค•ा เคธाเคฎเคจा เค•เคฐ เคธเค•ें เค”เคฐ เค•ुเค› เคจเคฏा เคฌเคจा เคธเค•ें


Monday, December 15, 2025

Third Party Fire Safety Audit of Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)

Third Party Fire Safety Audit of Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) 

1. Background:

As mandated under the provision of regulation 122 (L)(1) of the Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to Safety and Electric Supply) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2025, “an independent third party fire safety audit of the Battery Energy Storage System(BESS) shall be conducted, as provided in the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to be issued by the Authority”.

In line with the provision mentioned above, the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) has prepared the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for conducting independent third party fire safety audit of Battery Energy Storage System(BESS).

2. Definition: Independent Third Party Agencies: The Independent Third Party Agencies (ITPAs) shall be accredited/empaneled by the office of Directorate General of Fire Services (DGFS) for the purpose of providing qualified auditors for conducting independent third party fire safety audit of Battery Energy Storage System(BESS).

3. Objective: Battery energy storage systems are inherently susceptible to fire hazards, primarily arising from thermal runaway and potential cascading cell failures and require special considerations. This SOP aims to provide an independent third party fire safety audit framework to maintain BESS installations in a condition free from dangers associated with fire related safety hazards of the BESS to avoid any injury to human, animal and property and also ensure the Grid stability. This can be ensured through the regular audits of the BESS installations & putting in place comprehensive measures to mitigate the occurrence of fire, prevent its propagation.

4. Scope and Applicability: This SOP shall be applicable to the Owner of the BESS Installations, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Independent Third Party Agencies (ITPAs), Auditors, Directorate General of Fire Services (DGFS) and Central Electricity Authority (CEA).

5. Roles and Responsibilities: 

a) Owner

(i) The owner of the BESS shall arrange for an independent third party fire safety audit of the BESS installations through ITPAs and obtain necessary fire safety approval for the BESS installations before applying for energization approval under the provisions of Regulation 45 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to Safety and Electric Supply) Regulations, 2023 and its subsequent amendments. The applicant shall submit a copy of Fire Safety Audit report while applying for first time energization application.

(ii) The owner shall ensure that the periodic third party fire safety audit of the BESS installation are conducted at intervals as defined in this SOP and such records shall be made available to electrical inspector, as and when required.

(iii) The owner of BESS installation shall designate a “BESS fire safety officer” for ensuring observance of safety measures specified under these regulations in their organisation for construction, operation and maintenance of BESS. BESS fire safety officer shall have experience in the field of BESS fire safety.

(iv) BESS fire safety officer shall carryout recommended periodic tests as per the relevant standards, and inspect such installations at intervals not exceeding six month once, and keep a records as per the checklist enclosed at annexure-I, test reports and a register of recommendations in regard with BESS fire safety duly acknowledged by owner and compliances made thereafter. Such records shall be made available to the electrical inspector, as and when required.

(v) The owner of BESS installations shall keep the reports of audit submitted by Auditors and the records as mentioned at ‘point (iv)’ of BESS fire safety officer for the period of not less than 10 years.

(vi) It shall be the responsibility of the owner of the BESS installation to inform about occurrence of any fire incident involving the BESS installation within 48 hours to CEA, DGFS and the concerned Auditor/ITPA.

b) Independent Third Party Agency:

(i) An Independent Third-Party Agency (ITPA) shall conduct the third-party fire safety audit of BESS installations through the qualified auditors associated with the agency.

(ii) An Independent Third-Party Agency (ITPA) shall keep records of all the audits conducted by their auditors for the period not less than 10 years.

(iii) The ITPAs shall enroll fire safety auditors for BESS as per the qualification criteria defined in this SOP. It is the duty of the Agency to ensure that the auditors meet required qualification criteria.

c) Auditor: (i) Auditor shall conduct the fire safety audit of the BESS as per the relevant standards and checklist annexed at Annexure-I.  

(ii) The auditors shall strictly adhere to the timelines provided in this SOP for efficient discharge of their duties.

d) Central Electricity Authority (CEA): CEA shall also review this SOP from time to time to align it with best international practices. The periodicity of this review shall be two years.

6. Criteria for Empanelment of Independent Third Party Agencies (ITPA)  An ITPA shall be a legal entity in India or a reputed International Inspecting body having an office in India.

An ITPA shall have at least 3 auditors on its regular rolls.

The ITPA shall carry out audit through qualified auditors who meet the qualifications/ requirements provided in this SOP. The ITPA shall ensure competence of its auditors.

The ITPA shall have an effective organization, monitoring and control mechanism that enables it to maintain the capability to perform the audit functions satisfactorily.

The ITPA shall have experience of audit in the field of conducting BESS related Fire Safety.

DGFS/Authority may, at its discretion, consider an ITPA as an entity which does not possess the requisite minimum experience in the Fire & Safety Audit provided it has adequate qualified personnel having experience in Fire & Safety Audit.

Independence, Impartiality Integrity and Confidentiality of ITPA

The ITPAs shall not have any commercial relationship with the entities other than third party audit.  The ITPA shall ensure confidentiality of information obtained in the course of its audit.  The ITPA shall ensure that all of its manpower including outsourced manpower responsible for carrying out audit related tasks and/or having access to related data/information/document are not only aware of the requirements under this head but shall also ensure compliance of the same through an appropriate mechanism.

7. Qualification of the Auditors

(i) A person possessing Diploma in fire safety from recognized institute/ Registered CLI (Central Labor Institute) or RLI (Regional Labor Institute) and having undergone the training and certification course from a recognized institute as per the guidelines specified by the Directorate General of Fire Services (DGFS) for the purpose of BESS fire safety aspects may be appointed as fire safety auditor for BESS. Person must go through Continues improvement year by year.

(ii) BESS Industry expert may also be certified as fire safety auditor for BESS. In this regard, such industry expert should possess experience of at least 2 years in the field of fire safety of BESS installations provided that such person should have undergone the training and certification courses from a recognized institute as per the guidelines specified by the Directorate General of Fire Services (DGFS) for the purpose of BESS fire safety aspects within 2 years from the notification of guidelines by the DGFS.

(iii) A person having ISO 45001, ISO 50001 lead auditor certificate from recognise body. Experience in Fire Safety Field is at list 10year. If person have NFPA certification or Level 6 Diploma or Level 7 Diploma will be count as under extra qualifications. Document submission mandatory.

8. Audit and Audit Frequency

i. The Third-Party fire safety audit of the BESS installation shall be carried out by an Audit Team comprising of at least two qualified Auditors appointed by

Independent Third-Party Agency (ITPA). The final audit report shall be duly signed by all the auditors and the Owner of the BESS installation.

ii. It shall be ensured that fire safety audit should be conducted for at least two man days for BESS installations up to 100 MWhr capacity, and one man day for each additional 50 MWhr capacity or part thereof, for thorough audit of the BESS installations.

iii. The frequency of conducting the independent third-party fire safety audit shall be as follows:

Pre-commissioning Fire Safety Audit: The Audit shall be conducted at the pre- commissioning stage, before applying for first time energisation to concerned Electrical Safety Inspectorate.

Periodic Fire Safety Audit: Periodic fire safety audits shall be conducted and periodicity of the audit shall not exceed 5 years from the date of previous audit.

Special Fire Safety Audit: In case of any major upgrades/repairs or after occurrence of any fire incident, special audit shall be required to be conducted.

9. Checklist and Key Areas of Evaluation

Auditors shall adhere to all relevant standards/guidelines related to Fire & Safety aspects of BESS Installation. A check-list including key area of evaluation to be followed is appended at Annexure-I.

10. Findings and Recommendations

The Auditor shall submit the audit report within the stipulated timelines. The report shall include, but not be limited to, the following parameters:

The availability of the provisions as per the enclosed checklist;

List of observations and any non-conformities as per relevant standards;

Recommendations to address the observed deficiencies and non-conformities along with suitable deadlines,

Any other recommendation for further safety improvements.

11. Timelines

Following timelines shall be adhered to by the Auditors and the Owner of the installation:

The Auditor shall submit the Audit Report within 3 working days from the last date of the completion of audit.

The owner shall take corrective action and comply with all the observations/recommendations, as suggested in the Audit report and submit a compliance report to the Auditor.

After receipt of satisfactory compliance report from the Owner, the Auditor shall issue the approval within 3 working days.

12. Dispute Resolution

In case of any dispute or in case of any deviation from the aforementioned guidelines; the owner or the Auditor may approach CEA for resolution of the dispute/issue in coordination with DGFS.

Note: Auditors use this checklist when they conduct audit inspections of battery installations.

This battery audit checklist:

a.    is specific to the battery fire safety stream

b.   comprises the questions for the audit of battery installations nominally performed within six months of the battery installation date – focusing on safety and standards

c.    is NOT and should not be regarded as an audit checklist for battery installations more broadly

d.   is NOT a checklist for installing a battery system.

 Key Aspects of the Audit

  • Regulatory Compliance: Verifies adherence to national (CEA) and international (NFPA 855, UL 9540, IEC 62619) standards.
  • Risk Assessment: Identifies hazards like thermal runaway, fire propagation, and explosion risks.
  • Design & Installation Review: Checks for appropriate separation, fire-rated barriers, ventilation, and passive safety features.
  • Fire Detection & Suppression: Assesses the functionality of smoke/flame detectors, alarms, and automatic suppression systems (gaseous, water-based).
  • Emergency Preparedness: Ensures manual emergency stops are accessible and assesses training for fire personnel.
  • Testing Verification: Reviews results from large-scale fire testing (like UL 9540A) for passive containment and alarm reliability. 

Annexure-I

Fire Safety Audit Checklist for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)

Facility Name: ___________________

Location: _______________________

Date of Audit: ___________________

Name of Auditor(s): ______________________

Name of the Audit Agency: ________________

BESS Technology Type: ___________________

Total Energy Capacity: ____________________ kWh

 

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND DOCUMENTATION

Sl No.

Items to be Checked/Verified

Status

Comments (If Any)

1

Does the facility have a safety plan documented?

 

 

2

Is emergency contact information for qualified service personnel (fire brigade, police, hospitals etc.) available?

 

 

3

Whether local fire department should be consulted during the design and planning stages of BESS installations to ensure that local emergency response capabilities and constraints are adequately factored in?

 

 

4

Are operations and maintenance manuals readily accessible to the O&M personnel?

 

 

5

Does the facility have a monthly in-service inspections and maintenance checklist?

 

 

6

Does the facility have maintenance records, such as a preventative maintenance log?

 

 

7

Have the electrical engineers undergone any specific electrical energy storage systems training courses?

 

 

8

Have certificates been provided to evidence the above?

 

 

9

Has the BESS systems and associated components been manufactured and tested to be compliant with safety standard UL 9540: Energy Storage Systems?

 

 

10

Has the BESS been installed in accordance with national or international regulations, standards, or codes, such as NFPA 855 – Standard for the Installation of Energy Storage Systems, NFPA 68 – Passive Explosion Mitigation, NFPA 69 – Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems?

 

 

11

Are all BESS enclosures of non-combustible construction with any insulation materials also rated as non-combustible and achieving a fire resisting rating (insulation and integrity) of 120 minutes?

 

 

12

Whether scheduled drills conducted for procedures involving emergency operations plan?

 

 

13

Is the Hazard Mitigation Analysis (HMA) available and approved by concerned utility officials? (NFPA 855)

 

 

14

Whether Safety signage displayed for identified hazard zone?

 

 

15

In case of batteries having acidic/basic aqueous electrolytes in liquid form, whether provisions for electrolyte spills containment have been provided as per relevant standards.

 

 

16

Whether Area around BESS free of dry vegetation, combustible debris, flammable material, scrap accumulation, vegetation growth and have free walkways/passage/Staircase etc?

 

 

17

Permit-to-Work system / LOTO for carrying out maintenance works in place.

 

 

18

Are outdoor equipment cabinets for inverters etc., securely locked, and any switch/control panels also secured to prevent malicious interference?

 

 

SPECIFIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Sl No.

Items to be Checked/Verified

Status

Comments (If Any)

1

Has at least 3 metres separation been maintained between the BESS enclosures in an installation? (Note: 4.5 metres separation is recommended where achievable)

 

 

2

Has at least 1.5 metres separation been maintained between BESS enclosures and inverters and Medium Voltage (MW) transformers?

 

 

3

Has at least 10 metres separation been maintained between BESS enclosures and switchgear rooms; High Voltage (HV) Transformers; back-up generators; fuel tanks; electrical vehicle charging facilities; sprinkler tanks and sprinkler equipment, waste enclosures, compactors, pallets stores, smoking shelters?

 

 

4

Whether forced ventilation system and automated louvers for safe release of the flammable gases and maintain internal pressure within safe limits?

 

 

5

Are any building heating and ventilation system inlets sited within 10m proximity to the BESS installation?

 

 

6

Is the area between the BESS enclosures and other buildings, plant etc., maintained clear of vehicles, combustible items etc., to prevent the risk of fire bridging?

 

 

7

Is the BESS housed in a dedicated fire compartment with at least 120 minutes fire resistance rating (insulation and integrity)?

 

 

8

Are openings for pipework, ducting, services etc., adequately fire-stopped?

 

 

9

Is BESS compartment maintained clear of other contents? If not, will this be rectified?

 

 

10

Are heating/ cooling systems suitably rated for use in potentially explosive environments?

 

 

11

Are the inverters adequately IP rated for external use and not unduly exposed to harsh weather conditions or impact damage from vehicles and other moving plant?
(Note: UL1741 Safety of Inverters, Converters, Controllers, and Interconnection System Equipment for Use with Distributed Energy Resources sets out the manufacturing (including software) and product testing requirements for inverters used for grid connection applications).

 

 

12

Are transformers manufactured, tested, and installed to BS EN IEC 60076 - Power Transformers?

 

 

13

Is the BESS be protected against the risks of lightning damage including surge and transient surge?

 

 

14

If a detector activated Video Surveillance System (VSS) monitored by main security control or Remote Video Response Centre (RVRC) and response.

 

 

Cooling Systems

Sl No.

Items to be Checked/Verified

Status

Comments (If Any)

1

Are the enclosure and battery racks cooled evenly to help prevent hot spots developing?

 

 

2

Are thermographic cameras used to help identify cooling issues within the enclosure?

 

 

3

If any air-cooled systems are utilised - Are the batteries adequately cooled?

 

 

4

If any air-cooled systems are utilised - Is a formal housekeeping regime in place to clean and replace air filters regularly?

 

 

5

If any air-cooled systems are utilised - Is the BESS enclosure regularly inspected to ensure moisture levels are appropriate and no wear or corrosion is developing?

 

 

6

If any air-cooled systems are utilised - Are any moisture damaged components replaced promptly?

 

 

7

Are dust levels/accumulations monitored and BESS enclosures cleaned as necessary to ensure a sterile environment is maintained?

 

 

Ventilation Systems

Sl No.

Items to be Checked/Verified

Status

Comments (If Any)

1

Where passive ventilation is utilised:
Are such systems designed, tested, installed, and maintained by a competent and experienced company in accordance with appropriate testing standards?
(Note: NFPA 68 - Passive Explosion Mitigation, NFPA 69 – Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems, BS EN 14797:2006 - Explosion venting devices or FM7730 Examination Standard for Explosion Venting Devices apply)

 

 

2

Where active ventilation is utilised:
Is the ventilation rated as suitable for use in explosive atmospheres and interlocked to the BMS and/or gas detection to activate upon detection of early gas release or potential faults identified by the monitoring equipment?

 

 

3

Does the exhaust point of any active or passive ventilation systems vent to a safe area in the open, and not located in an area where any exhausted smoke could compromise the air intake of other enclosures or buildings in proximity?

 

 

FIRE DETECTION SYSTEMS

Sl No.

Items to be Checked/Verified

Status

Comments (If Any)

1

A copy of the Fire Alarm Installation Certificate and Record of completion is availlable from Customer/End User.

 

 

2

More then one Service Provider was responcible for Maintaining Fire Alarm System

 

 

3

A Copy of as-build Fire alarm system drawing signed by competent body is availlable on site.

 

 

4

A Copy of Fire Panel operation process is installed near Fire Panel.

 

 

5

For addressable system a list of each devices with corresponding location is provided. The devices addressing shall reflect actual room names or numbers that are current to the building use.

 

 

6

The dedicated 220-240V AC branch circuit for the fire alarm control panel is labeled " Fire Alarm Circuit" on the electrical panel or actual circuit breaker is colored RED as per NFPA 72

 

 

7

The dedicated 220-240V AC branch circuit shall be permanantly marked inside the Fire alarm control panel as per NFPA 72

 

 

8

UPS is use for powering up Fire Alarm Control Panel

 

 

9

Fire Alarm Panel is grounded properly by earth continuity conductor. Connection can be taken from electrical panel board's earth point.

 

 

10

Batteries are permanatly marked with Month & Year of Manufacture as per NFPA 72

 

 

11

Modbus / BACnet card is properly installed and output cable is properly terminated.

 

 

12

Graphic communication card us properly installed and output cable is properly terminated.

 

 

13

Any obstruction to access freely of Fire Alarm Control Panel

 

 

14

Fire Alarm Panel display properly shows FIRE, Trouble/Fault as with proper location text or information. Dedicated LED also indicate accordingly.

 

 

15

During Activation of MCP Fire Alarm panel are shown proper information

 

 

16

During Activation of Gas Detector Fire Alarm panel are shown proper information

 

 

17

After Activation of Gas Detector / MCP Fire Alarm panel are alarming, When Press Silence, the System is Silenced

 

 

18

After Pressing RESET key, Fire Alarm panel is Shows "SYSTEM NORMAL"

 

 

19

Repeater Panel / Annunciator Panel are installed ?

 

 

20

Fire Alarm Signaling devices sound throughout the occupancy

 

 

21

If sounder with flasher used, flasher is working properly

 

 

22

Check During Fire alarm PA system is turn ON automatically

 

 

23

Does the actuation of any gas detection systems and other BESS alarm automatically de-energise the power supplies and isolate charging equipment?

 

 

24

Check During Fire alarm Fire damper oparate automatically

 

 

25

Check During Fire alarm Smoke damper activate / oparate automatically

 

 

26

Check During Fire alarm AHU / HVAC oparate automatically

 

 

27

Check During Fire alarm Emmergency light oparate automatically

 

 

28

Check During Fire alarm Emmergency Exit Door unlock automatically

 

 

29

Check During Fire alarm Presharization Fan working automatically

 

 

30

Check During Fire alarm FIRE signal shown in BMS system software automatically

 

 

31

Check During Fire alarm FIRE signal shown in PLC/SCADA/DCS system software automatically

 

 

32

Check Gas detector Caliberation document

 

 

33

Check Bump test Details

 

 

34

When the fire detection system was last tested?

 

 

FIRE SUPPRESSION AND PROTECTION SYSTEMS

Sl No.

Items to be Checked/Verified

Status

Comments (If Any)

1

Whether hazard detection systems for smoke, gas, heat and flame have been provided as per relevant standard and whether the same is being monitored?

 

 

2

Whether Automatic fire suppression system has been installed and tested? Type of Automatic suppression system is installed (sprinkler, gaseous, water mist, etc.)?

 

 

3

Whether the suppression system designed based on fire and explosion testing data?

 

 

4

Fire-water supply (if applicable): whether hydrants, monitors, ring main etc. checked and accessible

 

 

5

Are fire pumps available and their testing frequency?

 

 

6

Whether manual activation capability provided for suppression systems?

 

 

7

Any Tube based Protection System installed at Main Incomer / Outgoing / Control Panel

 

 

8

Protection Agent details with capacity

 

 

9

Whether portable fire extinguishers of correct type installed and maintained as per relevant standard?

 

 

10

Whether fire-extinguishers visually checked daily (or at least weekly) for external condition, pressure gauge?

 

 

11

Whether Sand buckets filled with dry sand, free of lumps, kept covered and placed in designated positions?

 

 

12

Are all PFEs accessible and properly numbered for identification?

 

 

13

Whether sufficient number of gas mask has been provided?

 

 

14

Whether gas masks are conspicuously installed and maintained at accessible places?

 

 

15

Whether an artificial respirator, fire extinguishers, first-aid boxes and gas masks have been provided and kept in good working condition and locations of the same have been displayed in the control room and operator cabin?

 

 

16

Whether address and contact number of the nearest ambulance service and fire service, Doctor, Hospital with a facility for first-aid treatment for electric shock and burns, have been prominently displayed near the electric shock treatment chart in control room and operator cabin?

 

 

MISCELLANEOUS - Maintenance

Sl No.

Items to be Checked/Verified

Status

Comments (If Any)

1

Is all BESS equipment including batteries, cooling, and ventilation, BMS, controller systems and monitoring systems along with associated equipment such inverters, transformers, gas detection systems, lightning protections etc., maintained in accordance with Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and/or system installer guidelines instructions?

 

 

2

Is maintenance undertaken by competent, experienced, and accredited companies?

 

 

3

Are maintenance records regularly audited to ensure adequacy of arrangements and compliance with operating procedures, protocols etc.?

 

 

4

Is a programme of monthly self-inspections in place?

Does this include:

·        External inspections of BESS enclosure, including openings vents, footings, security locks, protective seals etc?

·        External checks of the cabling systems, inverter(s), and transformer(s) for signs of damage, leaks, corrosion, water ingress etc?

·        Visual inspections of the battery racks and modules for evidence of damage, leaking, corrosion etc?

·        Visual inspections of electrical wiring, joints, connectors, junction boxes and lightning protection for evidence of wear, fraying, loose connectors?

·        Visual inspections of the ventilation and cooling systems to ensure correct functionality?

·        Visual checks of the liquid cooled systems for signs of leaks, loss of pressure and repaired/topped up as necessary?

·        Visual checks of the air cooled system including filters, airflow, and dust depositing?

·        Checks of any gas and fire detection systems and automatic fire suppression systems present for signs of damage, leaks, pressure reduction, or other performance issues?

·        Thermographic cameras checks for overheating or unusual hot spots?

·        General housekeeping checks including dust, and presence of combustible materials or waste within BESS enclosures or within 10m of the installation?

·        Alarm or fault lights?

 

 

 

As mandated under the provision of regulation 122 (L)(1) of the draft Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to Safety and Electric Supply) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2025, an independent third-party fire safety audit of the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) shall be conducted, as provided in the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to be issued by the Authority.

CEA has prepared draft Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for conducting independent third-party fire safety audit of Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). The draft SOP is enclosed herewith. The draft Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is also available on the CEA Website (www.cea.nic.in)

About me:

Dr. Arindam Bhadra is a Fire safety consultant & ISO Auditor based in Kolkata, India, with over 20 years of experience in Fire safety systems. He’s currently founding director of the Sprinkler Fire Safety Awareness and Welfare Foundation & SSA Integrate. He working on Fire Safety awareness, training, consultancy & Audit in same field. Dr. Arindam Bhadra is popularly known as "Fire ka Doctor" because of his expertise in fire safety, prevention, and awareness, helping people and organizations stay safe from fire hazards. He is Member of NFPA, Conformity Assessment Society (CAS), FSAI, Institution of Safety Engineers (India) etc. He is certified fire Inspector and certified Fire Protection professional.