Fire Exit Door Alarm
Are you wondering what hardware you should fit to your emergency
exit doors?
In many buildings there is often unauthorised use of Fire Exit
Doors and Emergency Exit Doors. The Safety Centre now has a product in
it's portfolio which is designed to reduce the chances of unauthorised use of
these doors.
What the law says
In the Regulatory Fire Safety Order 2005, article 14 covers “Emergency Routes and Exits,” and states that, “In
the event of danger, it must be possible for persons to evacuate the premises
as quickly and safely as possible”.
Depending on circumstances, this normally involves
emergency doors opening in the direction of escape, no sliding or revolving
doors used as emergency exits, and emergency doors not being locked or fastened
in a manner that they cannot be easily and immediately opened.
The need for outward opening doors
Official guidance to the Communities
and Local Government department recommends that that all doors on escape
routes should open in the direction of escape, but states that this is
particularly important if more than 60 people use them or they provide an exit
from a high fire risk area.
Push bars and pads
Security fittings on fire doors should be thought of
as a hierarchy:
·
Nothing at all — the
safest option;
·
Panic bar/ pad;
·
Emergency exit devices
(the smaller pads and levers);
·
Turn knob, single bolt,
or other simply operated, single device;
·
Glass bolt.
In buildings used by the general public, the usual
hardware on final exits is a horizontal push pad or bar, unless the door is
completely free-moving, such as the front door (once unlocked).
For this category of occupant, doors need to be
operated easily and obviously. If there are more than 60 persons likely to use
an exit, and that group includes those unfamiliar with the building, a degree
of panic must be assumed. In this case, panic bars are essential. These
fittings are long horizontal bars or pads which operate by body pressure. The
relevant standard is BS EN 1125 — “Panic exit devices operated by a horizontal
bar”.
There’s an alternative type of a smaller push pad or
lever, which seems to be mistakenly put onto doors for use by the public. These
“emergency exit devices” conform to BS EN 179 instead, and are generally not
suitable as more force is needed to operate them, i.e. there needs to be a
deliberate action, not just pressure against the device. These may be selected
for doors to be used by staff, the benefit being that along with higher
operating forces, there is the opportunity for higher security levels.
Both BS EN 1125 and BS EN 179 include specific tests
depending on whether the device is intended for single or double door use. One
approved for single door application might not work effectively on double
doors, so it’s important that the one used is suitable for the circumstances.
Locking devices
BS9999:2008, “Code of practice for fire safety in
the design, management and use of buildings,” gives further advice on the
subject of locking. It states that in general, doors on escape routes shouldn’t
be fitted with locks, latches, or bolts unless these are simple fastening,
which can readily be operated. The operation of the fastenings should be
“readily apparent without the use of a key and without having to manipulate
more than one mechanism.”
Although it’s preferable not to fit any secondary
locking devices to fire exits, it’s accepted that security needs may make it a
necessity.
Where this is the case, the old glass box with the
key in it is generally discouraged, even where the door is for use by a small
number of staff. If you feel it’s the only way, and can be justified in the
risk assessment, make sure there’s a process for regularly checking that the
key is present.
A simple step up from this is to fit a lock that
needs a key on the outside, but which is operated on the inside of the door by
simply turning a knob. These can then be labelled “turn to exit,” if
instructions are needed.
Glass bolts can be useful for discouraging casual
use of a route — where a door passes through the premises of an adjoining
occupier. To operate these, the glass tube is smashed with a hammer, allowing a
bolt to be slid across. Staff will need training to understand how to use
these, and encouragement to use the exits even if they think it’s a drill or
false alarm. Bear in mind that this shouldn’t be fitted as an additional device
— a person escaping through the door should not have to “manipulate more than
one mechanism.” In general, they tend to be plagued by abuse, so they have
limited application.
Electromechanical and electromagnetic locks (EM Lock) can be
fitted, which can be released manually or automatically. However, these should
be set up to be overridden by the operation of a push bar, loss of power,
and/or the activation of the fire warning or detection system.